Spring SerializableTypeWrapper类的意义是什么?

我看到SerializableTypeWrapper 这个类只有ResolvableType用到。
且包装方法SerializableTypeWrapper#forTypeProvider只有ResolvableType#forType用到

我无法理解以下代码中
type实现Serializable和不实现Serializable有啥区别吗?为啥要特意去包装?

//org.springframework.core.ResolvableType#forType
static ResolvableType forType(
            @Nullable Type type, @Nullable TypeProvider typeProvider, @Nullable VariableResolver variableResolver) {
        
        if (type == null && typeProvider != null) {
            //这个type实现Serializable和不实现Serializable有啥区别吗?
            type = SerializableTypeWrapper.forTypeProvider(typeProvider);
        }
        if (type == null) {
            return NONE;
        }

        // For simple Class references, build the wrapper right away -
        // no expensive resolution necessary, so not worth caching...
        if (type instanceof Class) {
            return new ResolvableType(type, typeProvider, variableResolver, (ResolvableType) null);
        }

        // Purge empty entries on access since we don't have a clean-up thread or the like.
        cache.purgeUnreferencedEntries();

        // Check the cache - we may have a ResolvableType which has been resolved before...
        ResolvableType resultType = new ResolvableType(type, typeProvider, variableResolver);
        ResolvableType cachedType = cache.get(resultType);
        if (cachedType == null) {
            cachedType = new ResolvableType(type, typeProvider, variableResolver, resultType.hash);
            cache.put(cachedType, cachedType);
        }
        resultType.resolved = cachedType.resolved;
        return resultType;
    }
阅读 2.6k
1 个回答

type实现Serializable和不实现Serializable的区别在于其是否可以被序列化。实现Serializable接口的类型可以被序列化,即可以在网络传输或保存到磁盘等操作中进行对象的持久化。而不实现Serializable接口的类型则不能被序列化。
如果type为空且typeProvider不为空就会调用这个包装方法,这个包装的目的是为了确保即使type不实现Serializable接口,也能够进行序列化操作。这样做的好处是可以在需要序列化的场景中使用type,而不必担心其是否实现了Serializable接口。
总的来说,包装type的目的是为了确保即使type不实现Serializable接口,也能够进行序列化操作。

推荐问题